Agenda

  Meeting Minutes

  Decisions

 Planning Board Online

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TOWN OF HOPKINTON

DESIGN GUIDELINES

October 11, 1995  
Revised August 28, 1996


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

COMMUNITY CHARACTER                                                                                    

Hopkinton Center                                                                                                           

Woodville                                                                                                                       

West Main Street at Route 495                                                                                     

South Street                                                                                                                  

General Character                                                                                                        

DESIGN CRITERIA                                                                                                            

Preservation and Enhancement of Landscaping                                                          

Relationship of Buildings to Environment                                                                   

Open Space                                                                                                                   

Heritage                                                                                                                        

APPENDIX

INTRODUCTION

The Design Review Board was established by a vote of Town Meeting in May, 1994.  Its members are appointed each year by the Planning Board.  The purpose of the Board is to provide a detailed review of uses and structures having substantial impact on the Town, enhance the natural and aesthetic qualities of the Town, preserve the value of land and buildings, and to protect and preserve the historic and cultural aspects and heritage of the Town.  Board membership must consist of the following Town residents: Chairman of the Planning Board or a designee; one person qualified by training and experience in the fine arts or landscape design; one person doing business in the Town or a citizen at large; one person qualified by training and experience in the art or design professions; one member of the Historic District Commission or a designee of the Planning Board; and two alternate members.

The Board derives its authority and responsibilities from Zoning Bylaw Article XXI and it reviews Major Projects within the Site Plan Review process.  The Planning Board, which is the approval authority in Site Plan Review, transmits plans received to the Design Review Board for review and comment.  The Board reviews the plans in conjunction with the Design Criteria listed in the bylaw and the Design Guidelines, and makes its recommendations to the Planning Board.  The Board only reviews non-residential projects.

This handbook is a description of the criteria used by the Design Review Board in making its recommendations and its description of the community character of Hopkinton into which new projects are integrated.  It is also intended to assist those interested in making improvements to better understand and utilize the design review process to achieve positive results.

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

Jeanette Thomson

Jeffrey Doherty

Sue Ellen Stoddard

Claire Wright

Beth Kelly

Gail Fallon, Alternate

Jaime Goncalves, Alternate

COMMUNITY CHARACTER

Many of the Board’s recommendations refer to maintaining or enhancing the character of Hopkinton.  The following description of the character of certain segments of the Town help to define what elements make up the character of the community.

Hopkinton Center

The center of Hopkinton, generally surrounding the intersection of Main Street (Rt. 135), Cedar Street and Grove Street (Rt. 85), consists of a mix of building styles and materials with virtually all oriented to the street in a pedestrian scale.  The Town Common is open and well landscaped and provides a focus for the community.  It is surrounded by older traditional homes, Center School, a few businesses, and the Congregational Church, which serves as its anchor.  The Historic District includes properties on most of all four sides of the Common.  The use of traditional facade materials, brick, stone and wood, are predominant surrounding the Common.

Most buildings in the center have one or two stories and are set close to the street.  The commercial facades generally have large windows that allow pedestrians to see into store interiors, which contributes to its pedestrian scale.  The age of structures in the center range from older historic buildings to those constructed in the 1950’s and 1960’s.

There are a series of historically significant buildings on the south side of Main Street from Grove St. to Hayden Rowe St. which are included within the Historic District.  Other historically significant or interesting buildings present in the area are the Town Hall, 28 Main St. (listed on the State Register of Historic Places) and 70 Main St.  Buildings fronting on Main Street generally have a mix of exterior materials, including brick, wood, asbestos shingle and vinyl.  On the north side, several buildings have flat roofs, while most other roofs in the area are pitched with gable ends facing the street.  The on-street parking in the center of Town contributes to its mix of pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

The residential area surrounding and within the center consists mainly of older homes with pitched roofs and gable ends facing the streets.  Fine examples of some architectural styles are present, and the consistency of design between homes on some of the side streets contribute to a charming village center feel.

Woodville

The Woodville village area of Hopkinton is generally centered around Wood Street near Lake Whitehall.  This mostly residential area consists of some homes which date back to the early 1900’s, and constructed closer to the street than newer homes, thus contributing to the residential village scale.  Many of the homes are situated on small lots and are close together.  Non-residential buildings in the area include a fire station, post office and church.  A boat ramp on Lake Whitehall and Reed Park are important recreational features of this area.  Exterior building materials generally consist of brick, clapboard and vinyl.  A sidewalk along Wood St. and a few of the side streets allow for ease in neighborhood walking.

West Main Street at Route 495

The area surrounding the intersection of West Main Street, Lumber Street and High Street contains a mix of commercial and residential uses.  Homes in the area are small one or two story dwellings constructed during the 1950’s and 1960’s or in the early 1900’s.  Older homes are mostly Greek revival, gable end style.  There are a few mobile homes in the area.  Residential exterior building materials are clapboard and vinyl.  Lot sizes are generally modest, and contain trees and mature plantings.

Commercial uses in the area consist of a mix of styles, with the largest building at 77 West Main Street that contains several businesses.  This 2 1/2 story shopping center constructed in the 1980’s is set back from the street with a parking lot in front and in the rear of the building.  A Greek revival house was converted to business use at 85 West Main Street and establishes an anchor at the corner of Lumber Street and W. Main Street.  Most businesses in this area are well landscaped.  There are no sidewalks on West Main Street and there is significant pedestrian traffic.  The residential area on Elm Street is well developed.  Two gas stations flank W. Main St. close to Rt. 495 with large paved areas.  The entrance to the Elmwood Park industrial area off W. Main St. contributes to the non-pedestrian nature of the area.

South Street

The South Street industrial area contains buildings used for light industry, distribution and office and is adjacent to Route 495.  The topography is steep off West Main St. and gradually flattens out toward the Milford town line.  The sloping topography and the natural and man-made landscape in the area help screen the development from Route 495 and South Street.

Most buildings are one or two stories constructed from a variety of materials, predominately split face or rib concrete block, precast concrete and metal panel, with a few brick facades.  Most are flat-roofed structures with limited architectural treatment or interest and limited rooftop screening of mechanical equipment.  At-grade mechanical and electrical installations are generally screened or are located in the back or side of buildings.  Most of the buildings are relatively close to the road and to each other.  Rural character is preserved where berms have been used to screen views from the road or where buildings are set further back from the road with natural landscaping left intact.  Some parking is located in front of the buildings, but most shipping and receiving areas are on the sides and back of buildings.  Most parking areas are moderately to well landscaped and bermed to minimize views from the road.  Signage is generally understated.

The few residential buildings in the area are generally older dwellings pre-dating industrial development.

General Character - Other Areas

The character of Hopkinton is generally low density residential, with some higher density areas surrounding historical business centers in the center of Town and in Woodville, for example.  Some areas of Town are agricultural and wooded in nature with homes more spread out.  Two major water bodies in Town set the tone for those areas.  Lake Maspenock is generally surrounded by former cottages that have been converted to year round use.  Development is more dense than other areas because of its historical development as a vacation area.  The land surrounding Lake Whitehall is owned by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management and contains many walking trails.  Homes surrounding the area are generally larger and set back from the narrow winding roads in the area.  Toward Woodville, there are several former cottages that have been converted to year round use.

DESIGN CRITERIA

The design criteria established in the Zoning Bylaw are further discussed in this section.  For each criteria, the Board’s intent, policy and recommendations are provided for guidance.

Preservation and Enhancement of Landscaping

Intent

The landscape is to be preserved in its natural state as much as is practical by minimizing tree and soil removal.  Any grade changes must be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas.  It is the intent of the Design Review Board to encourage successfully landscaped sites and to preserve the natural landscape.

Policy

The natural landscape should be preserved as much as is practical.  Landscaping should be designed with consideration to the relationship with buildings, walkways and parking areas.  Tree and soil removal should be kept to a minimum, especially abutting adjacent properties.

Recommendations

1.      Plant materials should be chosen for longevity, low maintenance, hardiness and functional ability.  Plans should include the size and types of materials proposed.

2.      Landscaping of parking lot perimeters and interiors should incorporate existing trees, berms and other landforms such as boulders as much as possible.

3.      Evergreens are an effective year round natural buffer between business and residential areas.

4.      Existing site features such as trees, berms and stone walls can be used to shelter and enhance buildings.

5.      Plant groupings should be included in the landscaping plan to effectively break up paved areas and facades.

6.      Roadway, driveway and pedestrian walkway slopes should be maintained at 6% grades or less where possible.

7.      The inclusion of street trees in pedestrian walkways and sidewalks should be considered for projects which impact the streetscape.  Improvements should be discussed with the appropriate Town officials.  Final decisions on plant material should be made with recommendations from horticultural professionals.

8.      Street furniture and sidewalk enhancements such as planters, benches and bicycle racks should be of a consistent style, character, material and manner of placement.

Relationship of Buildings to Environment

Intent

The proposed development shall be related harmoniously to the terrain and to the use, scale and architecture of existing buildings in the surrounding area that have functional or visual relationship to the proposed buildings.  Proposed buildings shall be related to their surroundings with respect to height, street facade, rhythm of solids and voids, spacing of buildings or signs, materials, textures and color, roof slopes and scale.

Policy

New development, renovations and additions should be designed to fit with the site topography and relate well to the scale of surrounding buildings.  Rooftop equipment should be arranged in an orderly manner, set back from roof edges and screened from view.  Particular attention should be paid to street facades to ensure that the building and landscaping enhances the streetscape and does not detract from the character of the area.  Building styles do not necessarily have to be identical to existing styles or mimic historic styles, but should be complimentary and enhance the appearance of the area.

Signs should complement and highlight architectural elements of a building and should not obliterate or detract from those elements.  Signs should be noticeable but integrated into the scale and structure of the building and be in harmony with its style.  When there is a group of buildings or businesses in one building, signs need not be identical but should work together to form a harmonious whole.  Signs should be in keeping with the scale and character of the surrounding area.  Lighting should be of a subdued and modest nature and should be directed toward the structure and away from nearby windows and passing traffic.

Recommendations

1.      A study model should be submitted for major projects to demonstrate the relationships and scale of the proposed development to the surrounding buildings and streetscape.

2.      Exposed foundation walls should be minimized.

3.      Landscaping should be used to either strengthen or buffer the visual relationship with the surrounding area.

4.      A sight line study should be submitted to demonstrate a clean roofscape.  Screens and parapet walls should be considered to conceal rooftop equipment.

5.      Parking lots should be designed with landscaped islands within them.

6.      Buildings should be designed to be in harmony with the surrounding area.  This means that in village areas, such buildings should have a village or pedestrian scale that is pleasing to those who walk by.

7.      The use of natural materials is encouraged.

8.      Signage and lighting should be designed to be in keeping with the nature of the area, and should be designed to maintain the quiet nighttime feeling of the Town.

Open Space

Intent

All open space, landscaped and usable, shall be designed to add to the visual amenities of the area by maximizing its visibility for persons passing the site or overlooking it from nearby properties.  Well designed open spaces can often convey the illusion of greater open space than exists.

Policy

Open space and landscaped areas should be designed to complement, enhance or screen the building, parking areas, and the surrounding area.  Pedestrian amenities such as benches and bicycle racks should be considered.  Natural features should be incorporated within open space areas where possible.  The Board encourages site developers to complement the Town with aesthetically pleasing designs that are practical and functional and provide screening to paved areas and buildings.  Open space proposals should be consistent with Town open space goals and plans.

Recommendations

1.      Trees should be planted along streets and sidewalks and ample parking lot landscaping and screening should be provided.

2.      Ground coverage by paved areas should be minimized.

3.      Relationships with other surrounding open space areas should be studied when planning open space and landscaping designs.

Heritage

Intent

Removal or disruption of historic, traditional or significant uses, structures or architectural elements shall be minimized wherever practical.  The historic elements and rural small town character of Hopkinton should be preserved and enhanced by any alterations, renovations or new construction.  Those structures that are of a historic nature should be preserved and other structures should be in harmony with them.  Replication or mimicry of historic buildings is not the intent, but rather that structures complement each other in size, scale and materials and fit appropriately into the historic character of the areas.

Policy

Structures, mature trees and plantings, stone walls, fences and other elements of a historic nature should be preserved and maintained wherever possible.  New construction and changes to existing structures should be of a reserved nature and of a style and scale that does not overshadow or compete with neighboring historic structures but should complement them.

Recommendations

1.      Neon and bold colors are discouraged.

2.      Construction in a particular historical style should employ accurate elements of that style and be in keeping with the historic time period of the area.

3.      Colors used in the restoration of historical buildings should be related to the time period.  New construction colors should be harmonious with the surrounding structures.

4.      Buildings of with historical significance or heritage should be restored whenever possible.

APPENDIX A - Zoning Bylaw Article XXI Design Review

Article XXI  Design Review

§ 210-141.   Purpose.

It is the intent of this section to provide detailed review of uses and structures having substantial impact on the Town; to prevent blight; to enhance the natural and aesthetic qualities of the Town; to preserve the value of land and buildings; and to protect and preserve the historic and cultural aspects and heritage of the Town.

§ 210-142.   Design Review Board.

A.     The Design Review Board shall be appointed annually by the Planning Board and shall consist of five (5) residents of the Town as follows:

(1)   Chairman of the Planning Board or his/her designee;

(2)   One person qualified by training and experience in the fine arts or landscape design;

(3)   One person doing business in the Town or a citizen at large;

(4)   One person qualified by training and experience in the art or design professions.

(5)   One member of the Historic District Commission or a designee of the Planning Board.

B.     The Planning Board may also appoint up to two (2) alternate members who shall be Town residents.

§ 210-143.   Applicability and Authority.

The Design Review Board shall review applications for Site Plan Review submitted pursuant to Article XX.  It shall evaluate such requests based on Design Criteria in this section.  Its written findings shall be advisory to the Planning Board and shall be submitted to the Planning Board and the applicant along with any recommendations and conditions.  Such findings shall contain explanation and rationale as appropriate.

§ 210-144.   Design Criteria.

The Design Review Board shall review requests for site plan review major projects based on the following criteria:

A.     Preservation and enhancement of landscaping.  The landscape shall be preserved in its natural state, insofar as practicable, by minimizing tree and soil removal, and any grade changes shall be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas.

B.     Relation of buildings to environment.  The proposed development shall be related harmoniously to the terrain and to the use, scale, and architecture of existing buildings in the surrounding area that have functional or visual relationship to the proposed buildings.  Proposed buildings shall be related to their surroundings with respect to:

(1)   Height.

(2)   Street façade.

(3)   Rhythm of solids and voids.

(4)   Spacing of buildings or signs.

(5)   Materials, textures and color.

(6)   Roof slopes.

(7)   Scale.

A.     Open Space.  All open space, landscaped and usable, shall be designed to add to the visual amenities of the area by maximizing its visibility for persons passing the site or overlooking it from nearby properties.

B.     Heritage.  Removal or disruption of historic, traditional or significant uses, structures, or architectural elements shall be minimized insofar as practicable.

§ 210-145.   Design Guidelines.

The Design Review Board may publish and make available to the public on request a booklet of guidelines based on the specific Design Criteria cited above to effectuate the purposes of this section.


      Updated: 07/27/06

©Copyright Hopkinton, MA